We decided to try something new - publish a special edition ASOG e-Newsletter. Why a special edition? In this case, last November, many European-based ASOG members and Corporate Supporters had a chance to gather at the EUROPEAN ROTORS VTOL show in Madrid, Spain, for professional fellowship and networking. Based on this, the ASOG Desk Editor captured selected stories to share with the ASOG community regarding fellow members and ASOG Corporate Supporters.

EUROPEAN ROTORS VTOL SHOW

If you didn't know, EUROPEAN ROTORS, Europe's largest vertical flight trade show and exposition, was held in Madrid, Spain, from Nov. 27-30. In the past, the show was held in Cologne, Germany. Still, the organizers - the European Helicopter Association (EHA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) - decided to spread the love to other European locations.

In addition to providing exceptional business opportunities, the purpose of this year's EUROPEAN ROTORS was to bring the VTOL community (manned and unmanned) together to exchange knowledge, learn from one another, and debate with one shared goal - to improve safety in vertical aviation operations, i.e., something ASOG advocates all the time for both fixed-wing and rotorcraft operations.

e-Newsletter Sponsor

ASOG "MEET-UP"

The ASOG professional "Meet-Up" networking event held at Ibis Madrid Aeropuerto Barajas the night before the opening of the show was a resounding success, fostering meaningful connections and facilitating valuable interactions among ASOG members plus future members. The event started with a warm welcome and a drink(s) from the organizers (ASOG – Patrick Ryan and Event Sponsor – OFIL Europe: Dr. Peter Morawitz & Peter Schaffer), setting the tone for a relaxing and engaging atmosphere. Attendees from diverse Aerial Work and Special Mission sectors and expertise gathered in the retro-style hotel bar and made new friends and business connections. Plus, setting the stage for future collaboration, e.g., partnerships, establishing training courses, job opportunities, etc.

From the ASOG Desk Editor perspective, this ASOG in-person "Meet-Up" networking event proved to be a great "neutral zone" for fostering connections, fostering professional growth, and cultivating a sense of community between operators and industry. If you missed this Meet-Up, plan to attend the next events. We have several events in the pipeline planned for 2024 i.e., check them out at the end of this Newsletter.

ASOG "Meet-Up" Sponsor

ASOG "BASE-CAMP"

At this year's show, our ASOG Networking "Base Camp" was a bustling "neutral hub" for ASOs, aviation professionals, safety experts, and industry. The ASOG Base Camp was situated at the GA Buyer-GA Buyer Europe Magazine booth, with Astrid Ayling, Ian Sheppard and Patrick Ryan hosting. From day one, the base camp had a steady stream of visitors. As always, at an ASOG "Base Camp," attendees rendezvoused with old & new friends, engaged in meaningful conversations, exchanged ideas, and forged valuable connections throughout the event.

Along with this, ASOG Corporate Supporter Centum-LifeSeeker invited many ASOG members who attended the show to a special event in the heart of Madrid. Without saying, we enjoyed some great gourmet food and super conversations. It was an excellent opportunity to connect with industry leaders from Spain and other European countries, exchange ideas, and network among friends in a relaxed environment. Also, without saying anything, we would like to say "Thank you" to ASOG member and CEO of CENTUM Héctor Estévez and his team for a wonderful evening.

ASOG CORPORATE SUPPORTERS NEWS

Based on walking the floor of the show and visiting those ASOG Corporate Supporters who either attended the show or had a booth, we were able to get the latest news regarding their business efforts:

AV Buyer | GA Buyer Magazine – Firecrown Media has acquired AvBuyer. Firecrown Media also acquired GA Buyer Europe and GA Buyer Africa, which offer classified listings and marketplaces that cover the European and African general aviation markets. If you didn't know, Firecrown Media owns some of the most storied publications, such as FLYING Magazine, Plane & Pilot, KITPLANES, Aviation Consumer, AVweb, Aviation Safety, IFR Magazine, Business Air, aircraftforsale.com, and many more.

OLIF Europe – The Team from OLIF (Dr. Peter Morawitz & Peter Schaffer) revealed a new partnership with Phoenix Heli-Flight. This charter helicopter company operates a fleet of ten helicopters out of Alberta, Canada. Phoenix Heli-Flight has recently placed an order for OFIL's ROMLite OGI (Optical Gas Imaging) Hybrid system with radiometric HD LWIR sensors, plus a cooled MWIR imager for detecting methane, propane, and other hydrocarbon gases, marking the first-ever sale of its kind in North America.

CENTUM – LifeSeeker – CENTUM-LifeSeeker highlighted their collaboration with HENSOLDT Avionics and FlySight to improve and enhance the capabilities of the Search & Rescue community. CEO Héctor Estévez participated in the Panel "Independent and Versatile OPENSIGHT Decision Support System: One System for All Missions," sharing a paper with Arend Wedekind from HENSOLDT Avionics and Mattia Carpin from FlySight, i.e., Reflections on emerging trends, integrations and the innovation that LifeSeeker brings to search and rescue missions.

FlySight – FlySight presented its new advanced suite of OPENSIGHT's capabilities by offering live demonstrations of OPENSIGHT's diverse integrations with other SAR systems. With a particular focus on the OPENSIGHT system's versatility, FlySight demonstrated this with their new partnership with CENTUM and HENSOLDT.

Andrea Masini, Marina Ghidotti and Mattia Carpin from FlySight also revealed their desire to sponsor future ASOG organized & Industry provided ASOG Training events. Stay tuned for more information on the first course. Based on current discussions at the show, the first course will focus on "Basic SAR Mission Management."

Airborne Technologies (ABT) GmbH – The team at the ABT booth (George DeCock, Thomas Unger, and Marcus Gurtner) relayed that they are expanding in all cardinal directions. They announced the establishment of an office in Dubai, UAE, and signed a MoU with Norwegian Aviation and Defence Group (NADG).

Additionally, Based on a discussion with Bryn Elliott, PAvCON President, the PAvCon Europe 2024 event will occur at Airborne Technologies. Bryn and the ABT family look forward to welcoming everyone on May 28-29, 2024, at the ABT facility in Wiener Neustadt, Austria.

Smith Myers Communications -  The team at Smith Myers (Peter Myers and Andrew Munro) announced two new contract awards from European Coast Guard Agencies. Plus, they highlighted their partnership with the UAE's NSRC (National Search and Rescue Center) with ARTEMIS integrated into the NSRC AW139 Leonardo Helicopters SAR fleet.

WHAT'S NEXT

If you missed this ASOG event, we plan to conduct more in-person events in 2024. Here are some of the events we have in the pipeline:

• AERO Friedrichshafen, April 17 – 20, Friedrichshafen, Germany
• PAvCON, May 28 – 29, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
• EUROPEAN ROTORS VTOL Show, TBD – Est. November, Amsterdam, Netherlands

If you're interested in participating in future events or your company wants to sponsor an event, DM us at info@aso-group.org.

ASOG 2022 Focus Area | Industry Support

Source | ASOG Desk Editor

Undoubtedly, It's great to have a new corporate supporter who aims to improve the capabilities of the Aerial Work aviation sector. We're happy to announce Advanced Aviation Innovations / Scientific (AAI) Inc. is now a new ASOG Corporate Supporter.

If you weren't aware, AAI Scientific specializes in advanced Aerial Remote Sensing and Navigation Technologies. They have a range of high-resolution Imaging, Visual, and Gas remote sensing products and services to meet your needs. These include:

• SANDS Navigation System (For aerial surveying)
• High-Resolution Imaging and Visual Cameras
• Hydrocarbon Remote Sensors

To learn more about AAI Scientific and its products, check them out on the ASOG Corporate Supporter page (click their logo). – OR - You can "Friend" Randy Burkham and message him via the ASOG e-mail service.

The term "Pilot Error" is a well-known term in the aviation community. However, what is "Airborne Sensor Operator" and "Aircrew Error"?

ASOG Focus Area | Aviation Safety

Source | ASOG Safety Center

Pilot errors, Airborne Sensor Operator (ASO) errors, and Aircrew errors all refer to mistakes made within the context of aviation but involve different roles and responsibilities.

Pilot Error

Definition - Pilot error refers specifically to mistakes made by the pilot(s) operating an aircraft. These errors can involve misjudgment, improper aircraft handling, incorrect decision-making, or failure to adhere to standard operating procedures.

Responsibility - Pilots are directly responsible for flying the aircraft, navigating, taking off, and landing, and ensuring the overall safety and control of the flight. Errors within this category pertain to the pilots' actions or decisions during their duties.

Airborne Sensor Operator Error

Definition - An airborne sensor operator error refers specifically to mistakes made by individuals operating specialized sensors and equipment on board an aircraft. These errors involve mishandling or misinterpreting data collected by sensors or improperly operating the equipment.

Responsibility - Sensor operators manage and operate sensors, cameras, radar, or other equipment used for specific tasks like surveillance, reconnaissance, or data collection. Errors might involve misinterpreting data, incorrectly adjusting equipment settings, or overlooking crucial information during operational tasks.

Aircrew Error

Definition - Aircrew error is a broader term encompassing mistakes made by any member of the crew on board an aircraft. This term includes pilots, Co-Pilots, Airborne Sensor Operators, Flight paramedics, and any other personnel serving specific roles during a flight.

Responsibility - Aircrew error extends beyond pilot errors, encompassing a more comprehensive array of potential mistakes. It might involve communication breakdowns, coordination issues between crew members, procedural errors in tasks beyond piloting, and other collaborative tasks necessary for safe flight operations.

Conclusion

To bring it all together, pilot error is related to errors made by those specifically flying the aircraft, aircrew error encompasses mistakes made by any crew member, and airborne sensor operator error involves mistakes made by individuals operating specialized sensors and equipment aboard the aircraft for data collection or monitoring purposes. As you can see, each category denotes different roles and responsibilities within the aviation environment.

Either way, errors made from any specific aircrew position in the aircraft can lead to a possible "Chain of Events" that can result in mission failure or, worse, an aviation accident. Understanding your role & responsibilities is critical, and understanding (and supporting) your fellow aircrew member's roles & responsibilities is part of any aircrew member's professional duty & development.

As an aircrew association, part of our mission is to provide a platform for our members to share their experiences to help others improve in their professional aviation and aerial remote sensing endeavors. With that, one of our newer members just shared this article with the ASOG Desk Editor with the intent to help others – "My Hypoxic Event" by Darren Daigle

ASOG Article of the Month | January 2024

ASOG Author | Darren Daigle

Wing Tips

My Hypxoic Event & What I Learned from this Flying Incident

I have had a 25-year career in the Canadian Air Force CAF with about 5000 hours of flying as a Sensor Operator. I have also continued to fly as a drone pilot and now as a sensor operator using the L3 MX15HDi multispectral camera.

In my current job, I fly with a crew in a light twin. We do fire Mapping, and sometimes we fly high enough to require supplemental oxygen.

Our portable oxygen system was my first exposure to the "cannula" system, electronic regulator, and oxygen bottle. The cannula, for those unfamiliar with it, is similar to the tube and hoses you see with some hospital patients. I had never needed it in the CAF since the Aurora (Canadian P-3) is pressurized. The instructions for using the regulator and oxygen bottle were pretty straightforward. The "cannula" is a tube that wraps around the ears and is held under the nose. The regulator senses a breath in and gives a pulse of oxygen through the cannula.

The only description of using the cannula is a picture on the envelope.

I have had hypobaric training with the military, which proved invaluable in this situation. We climbed above 14,000 Feet AMSL, and the oxygen pulses seemed normal. I began feeling light-headed and immediately recognized a possible lack of oxygen. I notified the pilot. We walked through steps to ensure proper flow. I checked the oxygen supply bottle for adequate quantity; it was in the green. I then checked the supply hose to the regulator for kinks or blockages; there were none. I then checked the hose and cannula for kinks or blockages; it was fine.

I decided to wait and see what the problem was for the time being since the symptoms were so mild. I then decided to use my smartwatch to check my O2 level. It showed 76%. I didn't think it was accurate, but I thought it was too much evidence to demonstrate oxygen deprivation. I then pulled the cannula closer to my nose. I noticed that the flow occurred with every breath rather than every second or third breath. It became evident to me that I had the cannula to loose. My symptoms cleared up, and I felt much better. The cannula had to be tight enough to be uncomfortable.

I realized there is no documentation to help identify a lack of proper operation. I suggested to our company that a procedure be implemented to verify that the cannula provided a "puff" every breath above 14,000 feet. I feel this should have been part of the cannula's instructions.

I caution SOs to be very careful when using new equipment that doesn't have excellent documentation. If you think there's a problem, there probably is. Work on the problem until it is resolved. My pilot suggested we could declare an emergency and descend. It was my training and experience that made me hold off a little. Ultimately, the mission was completed, and a lesson was learned.

I hope my experience can prevent any other SO from suffering from a hypoxic event.

About the Author

Darren Daigle | Darran has over 25+ years of experience in aviation and aerial remote-sensing operations. His skills and expertise span 22 years in the Canadian Forces, five years as an IAI Heron UAV pilot/Instructor, three years as a DA-42 Mission Specialist operating MX-15 HDI in support of ALE and forest fire mapping operations.

ASOG Focus Area | Industry Support

Source | Eric GARNAUD, Airbus Flight Academy Europe

If you’re looking for a cost-effective, dual-use, multi-mission, adaptive Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft, Eric Garnaud at Airbus Flight Academy Europe has one for sale.

Eric says they have a Cirrus SR 22 Special Mission ready for a new Special Mission Operator. If you’re interested, Eric relayed the following information regarding its Special Mission aircraft configuration and how to contact him.

Specifications

Airbus Flight Academy Europe SR 22 Special Mission aircraft consists of various sensors (Electro-Optical Turret, AIS…) that collect data, SAMSARA computer (MPU) for data fusion and display of tactical situations to an operator console in the cabin, and communication equipment (Omni Line-of-Sight datalink, dual SATCOM/GPS, VHF/FM AIS).

Sensor & Mount

The Electro-Optical turret is fixed to the aircraft by a metallic structure bolted to 4 hardpoints in the baggage compartment. The metallic structure comprises two longitudinal C-beams and a transversal metallic square tube.

A machined arm is pinned to the metal tube and goes through the fuselage via a cutout in the baggage door. The machined arm features provisions to bolt the turret and piano hinges to accommodate the fairing. The support structure and the fairing are designed to accommodate EOS turrets from Ø 7 in. to Ø 10,2 in. and a max weight of 37,5 lbs.

The Electro-Optical turret is a TASE 400 HD from Cloud Cap Tech ( currently removed). This assembly comprises the sensor equipped with a vibration collar and a dovetail. The upper (female) dovetail is bolted to the machined metal arm. The lower dovetail bolted to the vibration collar, is sled into the female dovetail and then secured by locking teeth and a safety pin.

Operator Station

The Mission Console (see Figure 2.1 above) is made from a standard SR22 seat structure, which has been modified with machined parts to install:

• Two 15” touchscreens;
• Keyboard and joystick - Mounted on a flexible gooseneck.

Equipment Configuration

The supporting mission equipment and system as the MPU 200 AISV, SATCOM (SDU 7310, HLD 7260), and DATALINK (FEND NG, MODEM) are installed on an aluminum Support Plate mounted on the Structure Assy for Turret inside the baggage compartment (see Figure 2.1 above).

Electrical Power

The power distribution is given through the AFT CB PANEL mounted on the Structure Assy for Turret. Two cut-off panels are installed on the Support Plate to connect all the harnesses between the equipment and the aircraft.

Antennas

As shown below, three antennas are installed (Omni Line-of-Sight, dual GPS/SATCOM, VHF/FM).

Duel Use

It’s possible to return to the pre-mod configuration by

• removing the turret with the machined arm and closing the baggage door with a door closeout;
• Removing the mission plate and installing a cargo floor;
• Removing the mission console and installing a crew seat.

Additional configuration options include:

For More Information

If you’re interested in adding a dual-use and cost-effective airborne sensor platform to your operations, contact Eric directly via the following channels:

Eric GARNAUD

Responsable Navigabilité  AFAE

Airworthiness Manager AFAE

Phone: +33(0)5.17.00.82.72

          : +33(0)6.71.83.57.91

eric.garnaud@afa-eu.com

Airbus Flight Academy  Europe

39 rue des figuiers

16430 Champniers

FRANCE

We wish you a joyful Holiday Season and a prosperous New Year.

Thank you for being part of our professional community. We look forward to continuing to help you reach your fullest professional aircrew potential in 2024 and beyond.

As you enter the new year, please continue to enjoy our community designed to help you plan for success in your aviation career journey.

Your Friends at Airborne Sensor Operators Group

Patrick Ryan

ASOG President

Benjamin Kabelik

ASOG Secretary General

Tanja Wimmer-Ryan

ASOG Treasurer

Let the Networking Begin

You're Invited to Join Us for "Low Stress" Professional Fellowship and Networking

If you're attending this year's EUROPEAN ROTORS VTOL Show, come join us at the "ASOG Base Camp" (Hall 9, AV Buyer & GA Buyer Booth 124)

- Or -

Join us for our popular "ASOG Meet-Up" on the evening of the 27^th. Enjoy Happy Hour Drinks hosted by OFIL Airborne.com and have fun networking with fellow professionals.

For more information on how to participate, send your questions to - info@aso-group.org

ASOG Event Sponsors

ASOG Focus Area | Education & Training

Source | ASOG Education Center

If you're a newly assigned ASO supervisor or you've been given the opportunity to train new Airborne Sensor Operators from scratch, but you're not sure how to get started or organized, here is a good starting point for you to properly train the next generation of operators.

First, an ASO training plan should provide comprehensive instruction to individuals operating sensors aboard aircraft, often for surveillance, data collection, monitoring, or mapping tasks. Additionally, it should continuously reinforce aviation safety principles and best operating practices.

Secondly, an ASO training plan should not focus on a few specific job tasks or just teaching a checklist without explanation; instead, it should focus on producing a well-rounded ASO aircrew member. So, if you want to train "top-notch" operators, here's a recommended outline for a comprehensive Airborne Sensor Operator training plan:

1. Introduction to Airborne Sensors - Understand…

• The different types of sensors used in aviation (LiDAR, cameras, infrared, etc.).
• The role and importance of ASOs in various industries (e.g., aerial surveying, law enforcement, environmental monitoring).

2. Sensor Technology and Systems - Understand or Know…

• Specific sensor technologies, including how they work, their data collection methods, and data output formats.
• Sensor components, calibration methods, and maintenance requirements.

3. Aviation Fundamentals - Understand…

• Basic aviation concepts, including flight dynamics, aerodynamics, and aircraft systems.
• Aviation terminology and communication procedures.

4. Aeronautical Knowledge – Understand…

• Aviation regulations and safety protocols relevant to sensor operation.
• Airspace classifications, NOTAMs, and aviation navigation.

5. Pre-Flight Preparation – Understand…

• Pre-flight planning, including mission objectives, sensor configuration, and safety considerations.
• Weather forecasts and potential impacts on sensor operations.

6. On-Board Equipment Setup - Understand…

• Hands-on instruction on setting up sensors, configuring data collection parameters, and ensuring proper alignment.
• Power requirements and interfacing with aircraft systems.

7. In-Flight Operation – Understand…

• Operating sensors during flight, including managing data acquisition, adjusting settings, and ensuring data quality.
• Work effectively with pilots and other crew members.

8. Sensor Data Management and Processing – Understand…

• Data management techniques for sensor-generated data.
• Basic data processing concepts, including data formatting, georeferencing, and quality control.

9. Flight Safety and Emergency Procedures – Understand…

• Flight safety protocols during sensor operations.
• Emergencies and equipment malfunctions and how to prepare for and respond.
• First Aid protocols.
• Aircrew Survival practices.

10. Navigation and Geospatial Concepts – Understand…

• GPS systems, navigation principles, and georeferencing techniques.
• Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the integration of sensor data.

11. Data Interpretation and Analysis (Domain-Specific) – Understand…

• Domain-specific instruction on interpreting and analyzing sensor data for specific applications (e.g., environmental monitoring, agriculture, mapping).

12. Legal and Ethical Considerations – Understand…

• Legal requirements, privacy concerns, and ethical considerations related to sensor operation, data collection, and sharing.

13. Communication Skills – Understand…

• Communication with pilots, mission coordinators, and other team members during flight operations.
• To provide clear and accurate reports on sensor data.

14. Practical Flight Training – Understand and participate in…

• Hands-on flight sessions with instructors, during which trainees operate sensors in real-world scenarios.
• Practice in different flight conditions and mission types.

15. Post-Training Assessment – Understand, Evaluate and Identify…

• Trainees' ability to operate sensors safely and effectively.
• Areas for improvement and ongoing training needs.

16. Certification and Proficiency Test (if applicable) – Provide…

• A proficiency test to assess trainees' skills and knowledge.
• Certificates upon successful completion of training.

Remember that this training plan can be customized based on the specific sensors, aircraft, industries, and regulations applicable to the training program. Real-world scenarios, practical exercises, and exposure to actual equipment are crucial for ensuring that Airborne Sensor Operators are well-prepared for their responsibilities.

Last month, I wrote about why I think AI will not eliminate the ASO job but how it will affect the standard duties of an ASO. This month, I will highlight the specific operational ways AI will affect the ASO profession.

ASOG Article of the Month | September 2023

ASOG Author | Patrick Ryan

AI is likely to significantly impact the profession of Airborne Sensor Operators in various ways. The ASO profession involves monitoring and controlling sensors on aircraft, such as drones, surveillance planes, or surveying aircraft, to gather and analyze data for various purposes, including commercial, public safety, and military data collection. Here are some specific ways AI may affect this profession:

Automation of Routine Tasks - AI can automate routine tasks involved in operating sensors, such as data collection and basic data analysis. This can reduce the workload on sensor operators and allow them to focus on more complex and critical aspects of their job.

Improved Data Processing - AI can enhance data processing and analysis speed and accuracy. It can quickly identify patterns, anomalies, or objects of interest within the sensor data, helping operators make informed decisions more rapidly.

Enhanced Situational Awareness - AI can provide real-time data fusion and analysis, presenting operators with a comprehensive and easily understandable picture of the situation. This can improve situational awareness and decision-making.

Reduced Human Error - AI can help minimize human error, which is crucial in applications like surveillance and reconnaissance, where accuracy is paramount. AI systems can maintain consistent performance without fatigue or distractions.

Extended Flight Times - In the case of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), AI can optimize flight paths and manage energy resources more efficiently, potentially extending the duration of missions and reducing the need for frequent operator intervention.

Training and Simulation - AI can be used in training and simulation environments to create realistic scenarios for sensor operators to practice and improve their skills without actual flight missions.

Augmentation of Operator Skills - AI can be a valuable tool for sensor operators, providing additional information, suggestions, and insights during missions, ultimately augmenting their skills and decision-making capabilities.

Reduction in Workforce – On the negative side of things, while AI can augment human operators, it might also reduce the number of personnel required for specific tasks as Automation becomes more prevalent in sensor operations.

Summary

AI will likely transform the ASO profession by automating routine tasks, enhancing data analysis capabilities, and improving situational awareness. As I mentioned in Part I, Operators will need to adapt to these changes by acquiring new skills, understanding AI systems, and addressing ethical and legal considerations associated with AI-powered sensor operations.

With this, no worries about losing your job. Human operators' unique skills, judgment, and oversight will remain essential in airborne sensor operations for the expected future.

ASOG Focus Area | Training & Education

Source | ASOG Training Center

Suppose you're an Airborne Sensor Operator or a non-rated crewmember (Observer, Host Operator, Flight Med Tech, etc.) who regularly flies. Do you have the right aircrew role & responsibility perspective or focus? One aspect of this role is how active or attentive you are, from mission planning to debriefing. This attentiveness or attitude differentiates a passenger or active aircrew member. So, what are the signs of an ASO acting like a passenger?

12 Signs You're a Passenger

An Airborne Sensor Operator is primarily responsible for operating and managing sensors and data collection equipment on board aircraft, drones, or other aerial platforms. Their role is crucial in various applications, including surveying, surveillance, mapping, and environmental monitoring. Here are signs that an ASO may appear more like a passenger than an active crewmember:

1. Neglecting Sensor Operation - Failing to actively monitor, adjust, or troubleshoot sensor equipment during the mission is a clear sign of passivity. An operator should be constantly engaged with the sensors.
2. Inattentiveness to Data - Not paying attention to data streams, displays, or sensor readings can indicate a lack of engagement in the data collection process.
3. Lack of Communication - Operators must communicate effectively with other crew members, such as pilots, analysts, or mission coordinators. A lack of communication or failure to report issues or observations can be concerning.
4. Nonchalant Attitude - Displaying a casual or disinterested attitude toward mission objectives, safety procedures, or standard operating procedures can indicate passivity.
5. Overreliance on Automation - While automated systems are standard in sensor operations, operators who excessively rely on automation without actively monitoring the equipment or data can become passive.
6. Failure to Respond to Alerts or Anomalies - Ignoring or not responding promptly to sensor alerts, equipment warnings, or data anomalies can signify passivity.
7. Ignoring Mission Objectives - Operators should be focused on achieving mission objectives. Disregarding or not actively contributing to these objectives can indicate disengagement.
8. Lack of Adaptability - In dynamic situations or changing mission requirements, operators who fail to adapt or provide input for decision-making may not be actively engaged.
9. Physical Signs - Slouched posture, fatigue, or not actively manipulating sensor controls can indicate passivity.
10. Disinterest in Training - Failing to stay updated with training, not keeping up with advancements in sensor technology, or not following best practices can lead to a passive approach to sensor operations.
11. Passenger-Like Behavior - An operator who seems more interested in non-mission-related activities, such as socializing with other crew members, chatting, or focusing on personal matters during critical mission phases, may not be actively engaged.
12. Lack of Data Review - Not actively reviewing or analyzing collected data or failing to provide input to data analysts or decision-makers can indicate passivity.

Summary

It's essential to remember that effective sensor operation is critical for mission success, safety, and the quality of data collected. Any signs of passivity or disengagement from the operator can have severe consequences in various applications, including military surveillance, search and rescue, environmental monitoring, and disaster response. If you observe yourself or other crew members exhibiting these signs, addressing the issue is essential to ensure mission objectives are met and data quality is maintained.

ASOG Focus Area | News & Information

Source | ASOG Desk Editor

Fantastic News! Spur Aviation Services is now an ASOG corporate supporter. Spur Aviation Services, LC is a Part 135 company based in Twin Falls, Idaho (KTWF), and has been in business since 2002. Their specialty is providing first-response Air Attack Aircraft to support Wildland Fire Fighting Operations in the summer. In addition, they provide aircraft for Charter work around the US and expand their services to include C4ISR support.

We look forward to future engagements with Spur Aviation to help shape the Airborne Sensor Operator profession.

To learn more about Spur Aviation and its services, check them out on the ASOG Corporate Supporter page (click their Logo). For a personal touch, connect with Joe Werner (Spur ISR Project Manager). He just became an ASOG member.

ASOG Focus Area | News & Information

Source | ASOG Desk Editor

We’re proud to announce Andrea Masini just joined the ranks of ASOG Authors. In the past year, Andrea has posted several very informative articles on the ASOG homepage related to new technologies that relates to the ASO community. Some of his articles include:

• Using Technology for Effective Mission Planning & Management – New and Innovative Solutions
• The importance of a standard share video and its metadata – georeferencing images from an airborne platform
• Augmented Reality for law enforcement

To learn more about Andrea, jump over to the ASOG Team page and check out his biography under ASOG Authors. If you want to network with Andrea, click the “Friend” button on his ASOG profile…this will allow you to e-mail Andrea on the ASOG e-mail webpage service.

ASOG Focus Area | News & Information

Source | ASOG Desk Editor

2023 is quickly coming to an end. However, there are still many trade shows & conferences scheduled. Speaking of that, George DeCock is hitting the road and attending some of these shows.

If you didn't know, George is our ASOG Ambassador – and not coincidentally our first ASOG member. As he travels, he engages aircrew and industry to support the mission of ASOG.

With that, George just sent us his updated 2023 World Tour schedule. If you're attending any of the shows below and want to network with a fellow ASOGer, contact George. Tell him at g.decock@airbornetechnologies.at or +33675758920, which shows you'll be visiting. Without a doubt, if you meet up with George at one of these events, you won't regret it—his knowledge, experience, and network of Who's Who is extensive:

• GDH/17-19OCT - Warsaw/Poland (stand & presentation)
• GSOF/24-26OCT - Brno/Czech Republic
• AD&S/6-9NOV - BKK/Thailand (visit)
• Airshow/13-17NOV - Dubai/UAE (stand and TwinOtter ISR aircraft)
• EuropeanROTORS/28-30Nov - Madrid/Spain (stand)

If you don't know George, for 30+ years, George has been involved in the engineering and marketing of LoS/BLoS Coms, EW, Radar, EO/IR, and ISR systems. He presently enjoys work and life as the SCAR-pod and Sensors/Mission Specialist for Airborne Technologies, concentrating on new ISR technologies and new applications of existing ones. George focuses on developing new techniques, sensors, and customer requirements worldwide, specifically emphasizing any technology that will further enhance the capabilities of the Airborne LINX/SCAR-pod and ultimately reduce crew workload and increase mission efficiency.

He firmly believes in applying R-COTS and open-architecture software for all airborne surveillance systems. Furthermore, he is convinced that the future belongs to using small, multi-purpose aircraft and pods equipped with integrated multi-role sensors. He is working on several programs optimizing payloads for manned and unmanned surveillance missions and will share his experience and views on new ISR capabilities for airborne platforms. As a true Ambassador, he is always ready to talk about ASOG and sign up new members at any airshow or conference.

ASOG Focus Area | Training & Education

Source | ASOG Training Center

As most know, Airborne Sensor Operators (ASO) play a crucial role in collecting and analyzing data from various sensors mounted on aircraft, such as drones, survey, or reconnaissance planes. Geographic information systems (GIS) are essential tools for ASOs as they help collect, manage, analyze, and visualize spatial data. So, how do GISs assist ASOs, and what are some of the traditional GIS platforms used by ASOs today?

Related ASO GIS Functions

Regarding how GIS technology integrates into the daily life of an ASO, it ranges across the full spectrum of sensor operator duties. Here's how ASOs routinely use geographic systems:

• Mission Planning - GIS is used to plan flight paths and define the areas of interest for data collection. This involves identifying geographic coordinates, altitude, and timing for the mission.
• Sensor Configuration - GIS is employed to configure sensors and ensure they are set up correctly to capture the required data, such as aerial imagery, thermal data, LiDAR scans, or multispectral imagery.
• Real-time Monitoring - During the flight, GIS software helps operators monitor the aircraft's position, altitude, and sensor status in real time. This ensures that data is being collected as planned.
• Data Collection - Geographic systems enable operators to synchronize sensor data with the aircraft's GPS coordinates. This spatial reference is crucial for accurately geo-referencing the collected data.
• Data Management - GIS organizes and manages the vast amount of data collected during a mission. This includes storing, indexing, and cataloging data files for future analysis.
• Data Analysis - Geographic systems provide tools for operators to analyze the collected data. They can overlay different layers of information, perform spatial queries, and extract valuable insights from the data.
• Quality Control - GIS tools help operators check data quality by comparing collected data to reference layers or aerial imagery. Any anomalies or errors can be identified and corrected.
• Reporting and Visualization - Geographic systems allow operators to create maps, reports, and visualizations to communicate findings effectively. This is crucial for decision-makers and stakeholders who may not be GIS experts.
• Geospatial Integration - Operators often integrate data from airborne sensors with existing geographic information, such as maps, land use data, or infrastructure details. This integration enhances the value of the collected data.
• Post-Mission Analysis - After the mission, GIS tools help operators conduct in-depth analysis, such as change detection, terrain modeling, or environmental assessments, using the collected data.
• Archive and Retrieval - GIS systems assist in archiving and indexing mission data, making retrieving and referencing for future missions or research easier.
• Collaboration - Geographic systems facilitate collaboration among operators, analysts, and other stakeholders by providing a common platform for data sharing and discussion.

Overall, using geographic systems by ASOs ensures efficient and accurate data collection, analysis, and reporting, vital for various applications, including environmental monitoring, disaster response, agriculture, and defense.

Traditional GIS Platforms

As mentioned, ASOs use a variety of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software tools depending on their specific needs and requirements. Here are some of the traditional GIS software commonly used by ASOs:

• Esri ArcGIS - Esri's ArcGIS suite is one of the most widely used GIS platforms globally. It offers a comprehensive range of data collection, analysis, and visualization tools. ArcGIS Desktop, ArcGIS Pro, and ArcGIS Online are some of the commonly used components.
• QGIS (Quantum GIS) - QGIS is an open-source GIS software that provides many features and functionalities similar to proprietary GIS solutions. It is known for its user-friendly interface and the ability to work with various data formats.
• ENVI - ENVI is a specialized software for processing and analyzing remote sensing data, making it particularly useful for ASO. It offers advanced image analysis capabilities.
• ERDAS IMAGINE - ERDAS IMAGINE is another popular software for remote sensing and spatial analysis. It supports various remote sensing data formats and provides image processing and interpretation tools.
• Global Mapper - Global Mapper is known for its ease of use and affordability. It allows operators to work with various spatial data types and perform 2D and 3D analysis.
• Trimble eCognition - Trimble eCognition is used for advanced image analysis and object-based image classification. It is valuable for extracting information from remotely sensed data.
• PCI Geomatics - PCI Geomatics software is focused on remote sensing, satellite imagery, and aerial photography. It offers tools for data preprocessing, analysis, and sharing.
• GRASS GIS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) - GRASS GIS is an open-source software focusing on geospatial data analysis and modeling. It's highly extensible and has a dedicated user community.
• Opticks - Opticks is open-source remote sensing software that provides tools for processing and analyzing geospatial data, including imagery and point clouds.
• L3Harris Geospatial ENVI SARscape - This software specializes in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data processing and analysis, which is valuable for applications like monitoring changes in terrain and infrastructure.

Again, this is just a past and present view of some of the GIS platforms on the market. The GIS software landscape is dynamic, and new tools are continuously emerging. Additionally, the choice of GIS software depends on factors such as the type of data collected, the specific analysis requirements, budget constraints, and user preferences. Operators often select the software that best suits their needs and integrates well with their existing workflows. Therefore, it's essential to stay up-to-date with the latest developments in the GIS industry to make informed software choices.

Summary

As you can see, GIS platforms play a significant role in an ASO's daily job, i.e., from pre-flight to post-flight. A good understanding or knowledge of GIS is critical to being a professional ASO.

If you're interested in adding GIS experience or knowledge to your professional development to-do list, many online courses provide basic to advance training. Additionally, obtaining certifications related to GIS will enhance your value as an ASO and may open new career doors - hint, hint!

Calling all Airborne Sensor Operators!

Overwatch Imaging is trying to use AI's power to improve sensor operators' lives. Matt Nugent, Overwatch Imaging VP of Product Management and an ASOG Member, runs this project. He wants to hear from you about the details of your work and what challenges or problems you encounter in the work you do. Overwatch offers $100 gift cards in exchange for 30 minutes to 1 hour of a sensor operator's time for an interview.

From an ASOG perspective, this is an excellent chance for the frontline ASOs to have a say in the next generation of technology.

If interested in helping support them with their mission, please fill out the quick survey below, and Overwatch will reach out to schedule an interview.

Pre-Interview Survey 

Should Airborne Sensor Operators fear the future regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)? The answer, at this point in time, is yes and no. Because the AI revolution is just starting to expand in all directions, there is still much to learn about its effects. However, for today and the near future, ASOs should have no fear!

 ASOG Article of the Month | September 2023

ASOG Author | Patrick Ryan

In this two-part article, I'll highlight why I think AI will not eliminate the ASO job but how it will affect the standard duties of an ASO. So, let's start with reasons AI will not eliminate the ASO.

The bottom line is AI is about "Automation." AI can potentially automate specific tasks within the airborne sensor operator job. However, it is unlikely to eliminate the job but only change how ASOs operate. Here are several reasons why the airborne sensor operator profession is likely to persist in the long term:

Complex Decision-Making - While AI can assist with data analysis and decision support, complex, context-dependent decisions often require human judgment. Sensor operators are trained to make critical decisions based on the data they receive, considering situational factors, mission objectives, and ethical considerations.

Human Oversight - In many applications, especially those involving military or public safety, there is a strong need for human oversight and control. Humans are responsible for interpreting the data, making decisions that have significant consequences, and ensuring that using sensors aligns with legal and ethical standards.

Adaptability - AI systems are designed for specific tasks and scenarios. They may struggle with unexpected or novel situations that require adaptability and creativity, which are qualities that humans possess. Sensor operators can adapt to changing circumstances and make on-the-fly decisions as needed.

Technical Maintenance - The operation and maintenance of the sensor equipment and troubleshooting technical issues often require specialized human expertise. Sensor operators play a crucial role in ensuring that the equipment functions correctly.

Ethical and Legal Considerations - Using AI in sensitive and potentially high-stakes operations raises ethical and legal concerns. Human operators are needed to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, and ethical guidelines and make value judgments in complex situations.

Interpersonal Skills - In missions that involve communication with other team members or stakeholders, such as relaying information to ground personnel or coordinating with other aircraft, interpersonal skills, and effective communication are vital. These skills are not easily replaceable by AI.

Unforeseen Challenges - In dynamic environments, unforeseen challenges and uncertainties may arise that require human problem-solving abilities. Human operators can adapt and strategize in response to unexpected events.

While AI can augment the capabilities of airborne sensor operators and automate specific tasks, it is more likely to be viewed as a tool to enhance human performance rather than a complete replacement. The profession may evolve as operators increasingly work alongside AI systems, requiring them to acquire new skills and adapt to changing roles. However, human operators' unique skills, judgment, and oversight will likely remain essential in airborne sensor operations for the foreseeable future.

ASOG 2022 Focus Area | Industry Support

Source | ASOG Desk Editor

Great News! Overwatch Imaging is now an ASOG corporate supporter. Overwatch Imaging develops automated airborne imaging solutions for time-critical missions in challenging environments using cutting-edge software and innovative sensor payloads that leverage the latest advancements in computer vision, GPU processing, Artificial Intelligence, and sensor fusion to scan wide areas, find small objects of interest and deliver actionable geospatial intelligence quickly and efficiently, i.e., the kit ASOs use.

If you didn’t know, overwatch Imaging was founded in 2016 in Hood River, Oregon, and serves customers on six continents around the world, with missions ranging from fire, flood, and oil spill mapping to counter-narcotics, border security, tactical intelligence, and search and rescue.

We look forward to future engagements with Overwatch Imaging to help shape the Airborne Sensor Operator profession.

If you want to learn more about Overwatch Imaging and its products & services, check them out on the ASOG Corporate Supporter page (click their Logo). For a personal touch, connect with Matt Nugent (Product Manager). He just became an ASOG member.

ASOG Corporate Supporters Directory

As an Airborne Sensor Operator (ASO), you should know the Ins & Outs of the types of aircraft you operate daily (manned & unmanned aircraft). One aspect is understanding the common hazards associated with a particular aircraft platform. If you plan to fly regularly as an aircrew member in a helicopter, do you know the basic safety or hazards related to helicopter operations?

 ASOG Focus Area | Aviation Safety

Source | ASOG Safety Center

As an Airborne Sensor Operator or aircrew member, flying a helicopter can be an exciting and rewarding experience, but it also comes with inherent risks and dangers due to the complexity of the aircraft and the unique challenges of rotary-wing flight.

As a professional aircrew member, it's essential to understand the dangers of any flight operation, whether fixed-wing, rotor, manned, or unmanned aircraft flying. Understanding the key dangers will help you mitigate or avoid these hazards. When it comes to manned helicopters, the top dangers are:

Aircraft

Limited Glide Capability - Unlike fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters do not glide efficiently. If the engine fails, the pilot must quickly execute autorotation to land safely.

Mechanical Failures - Helicopters have numerous moving parts, and mechanical failures can occur. Problems with the engine, transmission, rotor system, or other critical components can lead to accidents.

Tail Rotor Issues - Loss of control due to tail rotor failures or damage is a significant risk. The tail rotor is essential for stability and counteracting torque from the main rotor.

Power-to-Weight Ratio - Helicopters require a high power-to-weight ratio to maintain lift and control. If the aircraft becomes too heavy or loses power, it may be unable to maintain altitude or land safely.

Flight Environment

Weather Conditions - Helicopters are more susceptible to adverse weather conditions than fixed-wing aircraft due to their slower speeds and lower altitude operations. Turbulence, wind shear, fog, rain, and ice can pose significant risks.

Inadvertent IMC (Instrument Meteorological Conditions) - Entering instrument meteorological conditions unintentionally can be dangerous for helicopter pilots, as they may not be adequately trained or equipped for instrument flight.

Spatial Disorientation - Helicopter pilots can experience spatial disorientation, especially in low-visibility conditions. Without external visual references, they may struggle to maintain proper orientation.

High Workload - Operating a helicopter requires constant attention to multiple controls and systems, leading to a high pilot workload. This can be mentally and physically demanding, especially during critical phases of flight.

External Influences - Wind gusts, turbulence, and weather phenomena like microbursts can significantly affect the stability and control of helicopters.

Flight Ops

Low Altitude Operations - Helicopters often operate at low altitudes, resulting in limited time and space to react to emergencies or obstacles. This makes them vulnerable to power failures or other mechanical issues, especially during takeoff and landing.

Fuel Management - Running out of fuel during a flight can lead to a loss of engine power and emergency landing situations.

Wire Strikes - Flying at low altitudes increases the risk of colliding with power lines, communication towers, or other obstacles that may not be easily visible.

Wire and Obstacle Avoidance - Helicopter pilots must constantly scan for wires, poles, and other obstacles, especially during low-level flying, to avoid collisions.

Autorotation - In the event of an engine failure, helicopters use autorotation to descend and land safely. However, autorotation requires precise pilot skill and timing and can be challenging to execute correctly.

Summary

Probably the number one hazard is Human Error. Mistakes by the pilot, sensor operator, maintenance crew, or ground personnel can lead to accidents. Human factors, such as fatigue, stress, and complacency, can also play a role in accidents.

To mitigate these dangers, helicopter crews should undergo extensive training, follow strict safety protocols, conduct thorough pre-flight checks, and rely on advanced technology, including safety equipment and navigation aids. Additionally, flight departments should enforce rules and standards to enhance helicopter safety. Nevertheless, helicopter flying remains a challenging and high-risk endeavor that requires constant vigilance and skill but is also fun.

PRESS RELEASE

London, UK - 11 September 2023. British UAV manufacturer Evolve Dynamics has embarked on an exciting
new partnership with radar technology specialist Cambridge Sensoriis to perform the first fully autonomous
drone landing. Cambridge Sensoriis’ ARC radar sensor devices have been integrated with Evolve Dynamics’ Sky
Mantis UAV to achieve autonomous landing, loitering and zonal position hold without the use of any other
sensors. This system is therefore ideally suited to operation in GPS-denied environments.

Evolve Dynamics’ Chief Commercial Officer, Laurence Mallinson explained:

“By using radar pods that communicate with each other, our UAVs will be able to land autonomously in any
weather, on a moving host platform, or in a GPS-denied environment. The key aspect of the system is that it is
not reliant on visual navigation methods such as 2D barcodes or LED’s, and therefore is able to operate in
adverse weather conditions and complete invisibility, such as fog or mist.”

The partnership sees Cambridge Sensoriis’ ground-based radar beacons communicating with a Sensoriis airside
radar mounted in the Sky Mantis aircraft, which passes precision positioning data to the autopilot.

This pioneering technology offers extremely robust positioning autonomy to Evolve Dynamics’ Sky Mantis for
operations involving vessel landing, loitering in holding positions both static and moving, and constraining
flight to defined corridors or zones. With the use of Sensoriis’ radar, Sky Mantis can launch from, follow, and
land on a moving vehicle or boat.

Cambridge Sensoriis’ CEO, Steve Clark, commented:

“We’ve believed for some time that our radar-based positional information could add value to drone
deployments, but it has taken the expertise and support of Evolve Dynamics to see that come to fruition with
actual real-world autonomous manoeuvring and landing. It’s a first for us. We’re delighted with the
collaborative spirit of this partnership, and the opportunity ahead.”

Evolve Dynamics’ CEO, Mike Dewhirst, added:

“This is a major step forward. To achieve resilient autonomy and positioning without existing infrastructure,
such as GPS, is essential. This is critical in defence scenarios, where we already have a strong market presence,
as well as for the general scalability of industry drone solutions that will require strong resilience and
redundancy.”

For more information please contact:

Evolve Dynamics – Laurence Mallinson, laurence.mallinson@evolvedynamics.com
Cambridge Sensoriis – Mac Exon-Taylor, mac.exontaylor@cambsensoriis.com

About Evolve Dynamics:

Evolve Dynamics is a UK based UAV / UAS design and manufacturing company delivering aircraft and software
solutions to customers across industries including public safety, defence and energy. Evolve Dynamics was born
to find solutions to the most difficult, real world problems through UAV technology.

Evolve Dynamics’ primary focus is on user needs, understanding the problems they face and the tasks they
need to accomplish.

Evolve Dynamics aims to contribute to a better future by enabling a more carbon neutral, secure and safe
environment, delivering life-saving equipment, and providing value-for-money.

https://evolvedynamics.com/

...............................

About Cambridge Sensoriis:

Cambridge Sensoriis is a UK company with deep expertise in radar technology, whose mission has been to
develop radar solutions in a micro form that are suitable for deployment on Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles, to
support landing, localisation and collision avoidance.

https://www.cambsensoriis.com/

ASOG Article of the Month | August 2023

ASOG Author | Patrick Ryan

As an Airborne Sensor Operator (ASO), our world primarily consists of electronic systems and components. Besides the aircraft's electrical system (manned or unmanned) we fly, ASOs are responsible for a myriad of mission support electrical systems. These systems could range from passive & active sensors, mission management units, downlinks, and many more electrical components.

At some point in time, and adding Murphy's Law, ASOs will face an electrical problem at some point in time. Even though some ASOs have the luxury of having a dedicated maintenance team (e.g., military and public safety flight organizations) to deal with an electrical problem, many don't in the civil ASO community.

So, with that, if you're in the business of flying as an ASO, do you have a good "Swiss army knife" process for troubleshooting an electronic problem? If not, here are some practical "what to do" principles on how to manage and solve electrical issues (or in a UAV Mission Control Unit):

NOTE

Besides "Safety First," the below troubleshooting principles have no particular order. Based on the problem and situation, the order of these principles or actions could be different.

Safety First - Before troubleshooting, ensure the aircraft and mission system are correctly secured, and all safety precautions are in place. Bottomline…follow all Caution, Warning, and Notes associated with the aircraft and the systems – or – what makes sense, i.e., you don't want to turn a minor problem into a big problem.

Review Documentation - Consult the aircraft's maintenance manual, wiring diagrams, and other relevant documentation to understand the electrical system's layout and components.

Understand the Symptoms - Gather as much information as possible about the specific electrical problem. This includes understanding the symptoms when they occur and any relevant circumstances.

Isolate the Problem - Start by identifying the affected circuit or system. Use circuit diagrams and schematics to trace the path of the electrical current and pinpoint the problem area.

Check for Obvious Issues - Inspect the system for visible damage, loose connections, lost or disconnected wires, burnt components, or signs of overheating.

Use Test Equipment - Employ appropriate testing equipment such as multimeters, continuity testers, and insulation resistance testers to measure voltage, current, and resistance values. Verify the presence of power at various points in the circuit to determine if there is a power supply issue.

Follow a Systematic Approach - Divide the troubleshooting process into smaller steps to systematically eliminate potential causes. Start from the power source and work your way towards the load—test components one by one to identify any faulty components.

Check Grounds - Ensure the aircraft's electrical components and systems are correctly grounded, and the grounding connections are secure.

Consider Environmental Factors - Be aware of environmental factors affecting the electrical system, such as temperature, humidity, and vibration.

Record Findings - Maintain detailed records of your findings, including measurements, observations, and any corrective actions taken.

Consult with Experts - Seek assistance from experienced aircraft electricians or maintenance personnel if you encounter difficulties or if the problem is complex.

Verify Repairs - After making repairs or adjustments, verify that the issue is resolved by conducting functional tests and rechecking measurements.

Regulatory Compliance - Ensure that all repairs and modifications comply with aviation regulations, standards, and warranty requirements. Document all work performed.

Systematic Reintegration - Reintegrate the aircraft's electrical systems carefully, ensuring all connections are secure and wiring is routed correctly and protected.

Post-Repair Testing - Perform thorough post-repair testing to confirm that the problem is resolved and that the aircraft's electrical systems are functioning correctly.

Documentation - Complete all necessary maintenance documentation and log entries to record the troubleshooting process, repairs, and any parts replaced.

Follow-up - Monitor the system after troubleshooting to ensure the issue does not recur and that the aircraft remains in safe operating condition.

Now you know what it takes to troubleshoot an electrical problem. Always remember that aircraft and mission electrical systems are critical for safe flight operations and mission success, and safety should be the top priority during troubleshooting and maintenance activities. If you are not trained or certified to perform electrical maintenance on an aircraft or a particular mission system, seek the assistance of qualified professionals.